Media: mlamb@studentsforlife.org         540.834.4600

We are

exposing

the ERA!

the era is about abortion

The Equal Rights Amendment is not about Equal Rights—it is about ensuring abortion is legal in all nine months and taxpayer funded.

In 1982, the ERA fell three states short of ratification to be added as an amendment to the U.S. Constitution. However, abortion activists are now afraid that Roe v. Wade is going to fall, returning the decision of legal abortion back to the States. The National Organization for Women President, Toni Van Pelt, has already admitted,  the ERA “is hugely important for reproductive rights, for birth control, for abortion…"  

 

To “protect” abortion, the pro-abortion lobby has decided to try to ratify the ERA in the remaining three states and then hope Congress or the courts will nullify the original time expiration. Legislators in Nevada and Illinois have already voted to ratify, there is only one state left.

 

Petition Against

The Equal Rights Amendment

 

 

Dear Legislators: 

 

In the name of helping women, a worthy goal, once again the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) is advancing where forces with interests that don’t involve women’s true needs will argue that ERA is a solution to a problem it doesn’t address. Let us be clear, laws protecting women’s interests will be undercut by the radical language of ERA that strips away from women their unique place in the law. Not only will real protections be overwritten by this heavy-handed measure, the most profound change will be creating a constitutional foothold for abortion. 

 

A vote in favor of ratifying the ERA is a vote to advance the interests of the abortion industry, and it is a vote against women’s interests, weakening their hard-won rights.

 

This is not the Equal Rights Amendment, but rather the Everything Related to Abortion Act, as this measure will in fact do what Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton do not -- create an actual place in our Constitution on which to hang the interest of the abortion industry. 

 

Rather than empowering women, the radical ERA empowers courts, Congress and regulatory agencies among others to decide that a pet political project of theirs should have status and power of the law. Ironically, the arguments used for ERA in the 70s are moot today as laws requiring equal pay, forbidding discrimination by sex or barring entry into schools, the workplace or public life have long since been enacted. We are no longer in need of the women’s movement of the 1970s; times have changed.

 

The issue today is not the absence of laws protecting women; the issue is a radical agenda of empowering abortionists with new, constitutional cover. 

 

Abortion advocates including those at NARAL, the ACLU and Planned Parenthood, have argued in state courts that state-ERA laws require abortion on demand with taxpayer funding. In the states of New Mexico and Connecticut, courts have agreed that abortion should be covered by taxpayers based on their reading of ERA language similar to what has been proposed. At EqualRightsAmendment.org a Who’s Who of abortion industry voices are all in unison about their desire for this to pass. 

 

 in Doe v. Maher, “the Connecticut Supreme Court wrote, ‘Since only women become pregnant, discrimination against pregnancy by not funding abortions…is sex-oriented discrimination…The Court concludes that the regulation that restricts the funding of abortions…violates Connecticut’s Equal Rights Amendment.’ In New Mexico Right to Choose, NARAL, et al v. Johnson, the New Mexico Supreme Court ordered the state to pay for Medicaid abortions, saying the state could not differentiate between abortions and medical procedures sought by men. ‘Equality of rights under law shall not be denied…on account of sex.’”

Consider that

 

The abortion lobby consistently pushes a narrative that camouflages the many dangers of abortion. But pregnancy is not a disease cured by abortion, requiring that preborn life be ended.

 

The abortion industry, from day one, has used the courts to force an agenda that compassionate voters do not embrace. And even as legislators are asked to waste a valuable vote on ERA, this matter will have to go to the courts as the deadline for ratifying ERA passed decades ago. Abortion advocates say they can win in court, but why waste the time of Virginia legislators or Virginia taxpayer dollars to work on a measure destined for the costly and time-consuming environment of the courts? 

 

We believe that missing all the deadlines and failing to follow the lawful constructs of the political process is reason enough to vote NO as the measure wastes valuable time, money and political will to advance the agenda of aging feminists. This dated agenda is not worth the time or effort required to pass it or defend it in court and does not represent the needs of today’s women.


We the undersigned urge you to vote NO on ERA and YES to matters that truly help empower women to realize their dreams and fulfill their potential, women born and preborn, who have moved past the dated agenda being pushed on the legislature today. You can do so much more for women by voting NO on ERA ratification, and voting YES on things that actually help women achieve in the current marketplace. The Everything Related to Abortion Act should remain an historical footnote in the story of efforts to advance women’s true needs in this country.

 

Regards, 

 

Kristan Hawkins

President, Students for Life of America

Students for Life Action 

 

Anne Schlafly Cori

Chairman, Eagle Forum

 

Eunie Smith                                                                     

President, Eagle Forum   

 

Jeanne F. Mancini

President, March For Life

 

Penny Nance

President, Concerned Women for America

 

Kenda Bartlett

Executive Director, Concerned Women for America

  

Connie Eller

Missouri Blacks for Life

 

Victoria Cobb

President, The Family Foundation 

 

Cathy Ruse

Senior Fellow and Director of Human Dignity, Family Research Council

 

Evangelist Alveda C. King

Civil Rights for The Unborn

 

Marie Tasy

Executive Director, New Jersey Right to Life

 

Mary Kate Knorr

Executive Director, Illinois Right to Life

 

Meg Wittman

Executive Director, Right to Life of Greater Cincinnati

 

Georgette Forney

President, Anglicans for Life

Co-Founder, Silent No More Awareness Campaign

 

 

 

 Debbie Leininger

State Director, Concerned Women for America of Illinois

 

Penny Morell

State Director, Concerned Women for America of Maine

 

Bev Ehlen

State Director, Concerned Women for America of Missouri

 

Jill Noble

Area Director - Kansas City, Concerned Women for America of Missouri

 

Linda Thorson

State Director, Concerned Women for America North Dakota

 

Linda Schauer

State Director, Concerned Women for America of South Dakota

 

Ann Hettinger

State Director, Concerned Women for America of Texas

 

Beverly Roberts

Area Director – South Texas, Concerned Women for America of Texas

 

Toni DeLancey

State Director, Concerned Women for America of Virginia  

Abby Johnson

CEO, And Then There Were None

Rebecca Hagelin
Secretary, Council for National Policy

Lauren Muzyka

Executive DirectorSidewalk Advocates For Life